The saying “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree” often proves true, and the celebrities featured in this article all have children who followed their footsteps and became famous as well. The kids are achieving great results, just like their parents did when they were the same age.
Bright Side prepared a compilation of side-by-side photos of celebrities and their kids as peers. It shows not only the similarity and difference in their faces but also how the trends changed with time — some of these kids would not get the hairstyle their parents had!
Lenny Kravitz and Zoe Kravitz at age 32
Angelina Jolie and Shiloh Jolie-Pitt at age 15
Will Smith and Jaden Smith at age 23
Tom Hanks and Colin Hanks at age 42
Blythe Danner and Gwyneth Paltrow at age 42
Goldie Hawn and Kate Hudson at age 40
Melanie Griffith and Dakota Johnson at age 32
Damon Wayans and Damon Wayans Jr. at age 31
Meryl Streep and Mamie Gummer at age 37
Ron Howard and Bryce Dallas Howard at age 38
Demi Moore and Rumer Willis at age 28
Uma Thurman and Maya Hawke at age 22
Lea Thompson and Zoey Deutch at age 24
Carrie Fisher and Billie Lourd at age 27
Can you see the resemblance? Do you think the child or the parent looks the best?
Got some cool photos or stories and want to be featured on Bright Side? Send them all right HERE and right now. Meanwhile, we’re waiting!
Campbell’s Soup: A Tale of Survival Amidst a Changing Market Landscape
The well-known American company Campbell’s Soup, which has endured for almost 200 years, is dealing with serious issues that might force it to close.
The corporation is battling a changing customer trend that deviates from Campbell’s traditionally processed offerings and supports natural and unprocessed food options. Campbell’s bought a number of businesses in an effort to meet the evolving needs of its customers, but regrettably, this action left the company deeply in debt—nearly $9 billion.
In addition to contending with growing debt and shifting market conditions, Campbell’s is also facing internal conflict among its key stockholders. There is a power struggle between the Dorrance family, who own a substantial 40% of Campbell’s shares, and Daniel Loeb, the hedge fund manager of Third Point, who holds about 7% of the company’s stock. Loeb has been pushing for radical changes within the organization, including as rebranding campaigns that might even modify the iconic red and white Campbell’s Soup cans. The Dorrance family, however, objected to this suggested change, which is why Loeb sued the business for purported mismanagement.
There has been movement in the direction of resolution and transformation notwithstanding this tension. Although Campbell’s has criticized Loeb’s claims, both parties have decided to add two of Third Point’s recommended directors to the company’s board. This suggests that additional changes may be in store as Campbell’s works to preserve its existence.
The loyal customer base of Campbell’s Soup stands to lose a great deal from the possible shutdown of the company, which also represents broader trends in consumer choice shifting. While industry watchers regard the shutdown as another example of consumers turning away from processed goods, devoted Campbell’s fans would view it as a significant loss. The organization will need to embrace adaptation and make significant changes to its business model in order to weather this storm and remain relevant in a market that is changing quickly.
In addition to determining Campbell’s own destiny, its actions during this volatile time will offer important insights into how well-known businesses can adjust to shifting customer trends and tastes. Campbell’s story will be used as a case study by companies trying to find a way to embrace change while holding onto tradition.
Leave a Reply