33 Thomas Street: The Odd 29-Storey Structure A building in New York without windows. What’s the purpose?
In the midst of Lower Manhattan, a weird 29-story tower with no windows rises lofty and enigmatic. Titanpointe is the code name for the location, which is 33 Thomas Street. This edifice has baffled New Yorkers for years.1.
Constructed in 1974, the structure was designed to resist nuclear explosions and was intended to house critical communications equipment. The architecture firm John Carl Warnecke & Associates viewed it as a communication center protected from nuclear threats.
This magnificent structure is still intact. A gray structure composed of granite and concrete, it soars 550 feet over New York City’s skyline. Because it lacks windows, this apartment building stays dark in contrast to the neighboring office and residential buildings. It casts a large shadow during the day and has an eerie presence at night. The soft hum produced by its square vents is frequently overpowered by the city’s cacophony.
33 Thomas Street, popularly referred to as the “Long Lines Building,” has long been regarded by New Yorkers as one of the most unusual and well-known buildings in the city. The true function of the enigmatic edifice, however, has mainly remained a mystery.
The Real Story at 33 Thomas Street
33 Thomas Street’s enigmatic façade conceals a darker mystery. This building appears to be more than just a venue for conversation. Based on information from architectural drawings, interviews with former AT&T employees, and papers obtained by Edward Snowden, there is proof that 33 Thomas Street was utilized as an NSA surveillance outpost known as Titanpointe.
The involvement of the NSA is more than a wild speculation. A sizable international gateway switch located inside the structure allows calls to be made from the United States to any nation in the world. These calls are believed to have been monitored by the NSA from a safe location within the AT&T headquarters. This covert monitoring program has targeted numerous nations, including friends of the United States, as well as global organizations including the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations.
While AT&T and the NSA have collaborated on surveillance projects, little is known about the top-secret programs that are carried out out of locations like 33 Thomas Street. However, the Snowden documents provide previously unseen details regarding how NSA hardware has been linked to AT&T’s New York City network. The technology and methods used by the agency to extract communications data from the business’s systems are displayed in this integration.
Steve Harvey Under Fire Following His Wife’s Use of the “R” Word
Certain words carry significant impact and should be avoided altogether. Some of these words target specific groups, while others are simply too offensive to tolerate. When Steve Harvey’s wife used the word “retarded” on social media, it caused public outcry. Steve Harvey stepped in to address the situation and defend his wife.
The incident unfolded in a video on Marjorie Harvey’s Instagram, where she and Steve were playfully cutting fruit in the kitchen. Marjorie used the offensive term while joking about an argument with her husband over vegetable cutting. However, her choice of words sparked a major controversy, prompting Steve Harvey to intervene.
In the video, Marjorie can be heard saying, “I’m sitting here arguing with my husband, ’cause clearly he thinks I’m retarded [and] I don’t know how to cut a beet.” This clip garnered over 400,000 views on Instagram, where Marjorie boasts 1.7 million followers as a fashion and lifestyle blogger.
Many of Marjorie’s followers expressed disappointment and outrage at her use of the derogatory term. Some highlighted the harmful impact such language has on individuals with cognitive disabilities and their families. Despite backlash, some supporters dismissed the criticism as excessive political correctness.
Steve Harvey defended his wife’s use of the word, arguing it was not meant to offend and that people were overreacting. He expressed frustration with what he perceived as an overly sensitive response from the public.
The incident raised questions about the public’s reaction to offensive language and the boundaries of political correctness. While some felt the outrage was justified, others believed it was blown out of proportion. Ultimately, the controversy emphasized the importance of sensitivity and respect when using language, particularly in a public setting.
Leave a Reply