Meghan Markle is thinking about a new name for her lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard (ARO), in case her current name doesn’t get approved, according to a source.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently rejected her application to use the ARO name, which has caused some confusion for her team.
The source mentioned that Meghan’s team might need to find a backup name, similar to what Kim Kardashian did when she had to change her shapewear brand name from Kimono to Skims due to cultural issues.
“The team is working on alternative names just in case,” the source said. “They’re a bit stressed but not too worried because Kim Kardashian also had to rebrand and it turned out fine.”
Changing the name now would be expensive because of all the branding work already done, but it’s not considered a disaster.
In March, Meghan Markle introduced her new lifestyle brand on social media and had filed for a trademark for the name American Riviera Orchard in February.
Her company aims to sell various home goods like cookbooks and tableware, as well as food and drink products such as jams and vegetable spreads. They are also considering adding a rose wine to their product line.
However, the trademark application was recently rejected. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) said that “American Riviera” is a common nickname for the Santa Barbara, California area, which makes the name too generic and hard to trademark. The USPTO’s decision was announced on August 31.
The American Riviera refers to the California area, including Montecito, where Meghan Markle lives with Prince Harry and their children, Prince Archie, who is five, and Princess Lilibet, who is three.
Another source mentioned that trademark disputes are common in the U.S. and can usually be resolved. “It looks like American Riviera Orchard has received a few routine office actions, which is normal when filing for trademarks,” the source said.
The Sussexes have not yet commented on the situation.
My MIL Gifted Me a Set of Rules Titled ‘How to Be a Good Wife for My Son’ for Our Wedding, While My Husband Got a Check
This narrative captures a powerful journey of self-assertion and resistance against traditional expectations within a marriage. The protagonist, Lucia, experiences a significant shock when her mother-in-law, Karen, presents her with a set of archaic rules on being a “good wife” immediately after her wedding.
The contrast between Lucia’s dreams of partnership and the harsh reality imposed by Karen’s rules is striking. Initially, Lucia’s reaction is one of disbelief and confusion, but as she processes the absurdity of the list, she resolves to turn the situation around with humor and a touch of rebellion. Each action she takes, from modifying the breakfast to rearranging the kitchen, cleverly subverts Karen’s expectations while highlighting the ridiculousness of the demands.
The climax occurs when Dan finally stands up to his mother, asserting that their marriage will not be dictated by outdated norms. This moment is pivotal, illustrating the importance of communication and mutual respect in a partnership. The resolution, where Lucia and Dan embrace a future free from imposed roles, symbolizes a refreshing shift toward a more equitable relationship.
The writing skillfully balances humor with serious themes of autonomy and the rejection of outdated gender roles. It’s a compelling reminder of the importance of defining one’s own path in relationships, unencumbered by external pressures.
If you’re looking for feedback on specific aspects or help with revisions, let me know!
Leave a Reply