According to the documents, Webb was the “head of Jolie’s security detail for two decades, and he remained in that role for approximately four years after the couple divorced.”
Webb stated that Jolie “required him and his contractors to sign NDAs relating to various personal and professional details of her, and her family’s, life.”
After the couple filed for divorce, they had a major custody battle over their six children. According to the documents, Webb claimed he “received multiple calls from Jolie’s representative, who told Mr. Webb to remind his staff that they had entered into NDAs with Jolie and that if they testified in a custody proceeding, Jolie would sue them.”
Webb said that he had conveyed the message to his contractors, and both of them confirmed that they would testify if they were to be subpoenaed.
The documents further claimed that “one of them told Webb that ‘he would testify about statements he overheard that Ms. Jolie made to the children, encouraging them to avoid spending time with Mr. Pitt during custody visits.’”
The documents also stated that the “the two security contractors both testified” despite being threated with being sued and shortly after, Mr. Webb’s company was fired by Jolie.
Webb himself does not claim to have heard Jolie’s directive instructing the children not to interact with Pitt during custody visits. He now also works for Pitt.
Jolie’s attorney, Paul Murphy has since then addressed the media over this matter. He said in a statement, “Mr. Pitt’s continued attempt to equate common NDAs for security personnel and housekeepers covering confidential information employees learn at work, with him demanding an expanded NDA to ensure the continued coverup of his deplorable actions remains shameful.” “This case is not about NDAs in general, but about power and control. All Angelina has ever wanted was separation and health, with positive relationships between all members of their family, including Mr. Pitt. She looks forward to the day when he is finally able to let her go,” the statement further read.
The latest filing comes after over a month after Jolie’s lawyer filed documents claiming that Pitt had been physically abusive toward her even before the alleged infamous plane incident of 2016. That incident, according to documents, was the final straw in asking for a divorce.
The motion that Jolie’s legal team filed in early April, most revolved around the dispute over their shares of ownership in their French winery estate, Château Miraval.
Her legal team filed a motion asking the court to compel Pitt and his legal team to provide “responses” and “documents” that explained why the actor “suddenly conditioned his purchase of Jolie’s share of Miraval on her agreeing to a greatly expanded NDA now covering Pitt’s personal misconduct, whether related to Miraval or not.”
Jolie firmly claims that this move to demand NDAs was Pitt’s attempt to “cover up” the alleged abuse against Jolie and their children.
Pitt was never charged with a crime after authorities investigated the 2016 plane incident.
In contrast to what Jolie’s legal team is saying, Pitt’s lawyers allege that it was Jolie and her team who requested a “broader” NDA.
Ве а gеnius аnd find thе diffеrеnсе! Givе it а gо!
Welcome to yet another enthralling visual challenge where your powers of observation will be put to the test, uncovering hidden details and unraveling intriguing narratives!
Envision a scene: two young men, perhaps brothers, sharing a moment pregnant with untold stories.
One, arms crossed, wears a visage of frustration, a whirlwind of emotions brewing within.
Yet amidst the apparent similarities lies a subtle incongruity, a difference that dares even the least attentive eye to discern.
Could it be an environmental detail? A unique gesture? Has the expression shifted?
The quest for answers transforms into a captivating journey where every keen glance holds significance in the pursuit of identifying the discordant element.
Prepare to delve into the emotions captured within this captivating image.
This endeavor will not only assess your knack for spotting details but also beckon you to decipher the narrative woven into the scene.
May this pursuit of discrepancies be adorned with thrilling revelations!
The moment has arrived to unveil the enigma of “Spot the Difference: Upset Brother”!
If you’ve remained astute to the minutiae, the solution to this exhilarating task is poised to unfold.
Behold the long-awaited revelation, vividly spotlighting the disparity between the two images.
If you’ve accurately discerned the variance, congratulations on your sharp visual acumen!
Did you notice the subtle difference in the sneakers?
Share your observations with us in the comments below!
We extend our heartfelt gratitude to all participants for embarking on this odyssey of observation and scrutiny.
Continue honing your visual prowess, as new enigmas and challenges await you in the realm of the “Quiz for Geniuses”.
Leave a Reply