A woman refused to take her husband’s younger sister in after her father’s death because the couple had decided not to have children together. The husband felt conflicted, as he wanted to care for his sister, but his wife disagreed.
The husband, referred to as the original poster (OP), shared on Reddit that after his father passed away, leaving his sister with no one to care for her, he planned to do anything for her. However, his wife did not share the same sentiment.
The couple had been married for two years, and the OP’s sister, who was much younger, saw him as more of a father figure than an older brother. The little sister was eleven when their father passed away.
The dilemma arose because the OP and his wife had not welcomed any children and had no plans to in the future. Despite the tragic loss, the couple did not want children, which became a source of tension.
The OP’s sister had two options for guardianship – the OP or their uncle (their father’s brother). They asked the sister to choose, and she opted to stay with the OP.
However, the wife objected, stating that taking in the sister would mean having a child, and since the uncle could adopt her, they shouldn’t have to.
The OP, prioritizing his sister’s well-being, insisted on taking her in, leading to conflict with his wife. After a heated exchange, the OP told his wife that he would let his sister stay with them, even if it meant divorce. They did not talk for a while.
In an update, the OP mentioned that he and his wife decided to go their separate ways after discussing the situation again.
The wife claimed he chose his sister over her, and the OP affirmed that his sister was his priority. Many people supported the OP’s decision, commending him for prioritizing his sister’s needs.
Some criticized the wife for not being more compassionate, while others empathized with her perspective, acknowledging the challenges of caring for a child dealing with trauma.
The OP and his wife ultimately parted ways, with the OP embracing the role of a single father-figure for his sister.
“Reason for gossiping”: Goldie Hawn, 77 years old, posted photos of her vacation in a swimsuit.
“And Goldie Hawn, 77 years old, gave internet users a reason to gossip.”
The paparazzi captured photos of Goldie in a swimsuit during her vacation, which alarmed the public. Many internet users believe it’s not appropriate for an older woman to be seen in public in this manner. Hawn’s fans rushed to support her in the comments.
Internet users flooded the photos with numerous comments. Some condemn Hawn for her seemingly inappropriate appearance as a 77-year-old woman, while others see no issue with people, even elderly individuals, wearing swimsuits.
What do you think about these photos and the act of wearing swimsuits at this age? Many comments have been posted on the photos by internet users. Some criticize Hawn for her supposedly indecent appearance at the age of 77, while others see no problem with people, even elderly individuals, wearing swimsuits
Leave a Reply