Can You Spot the Mistake in This Puzzle?

Over the years, many people have made solving puzzles their favorite leisure time. They range in difficulty from ones that appear to take an eternity to ones that can be finished in a matter of seconds. The mystery and attractiveness of certain puzzles are increased by their unsolved nature.

Views on puzzles are divided; some people adore them, while others don’t. Regardless of your enjoyment level, solving puzzles is an excellent mental workout. They inspire us to think creatively and unconventionally in order to solve issues.

A certain conundrum that has been circulating on the internet lately has many people perplexed. It doesn’t even appear to be a puzzle at first glance. The image consists only of the digits 1 through 15 arranged side by side, along with a statement requesting that viewers repost the image if they discover any errors.

At first glance, everything appears to be in order. There are no errors in the sequence of numbers one through fifteen; they are all present and accounted for. You could go over the figures a few times to make sure there are no discrepancies, but everything seems to be in order.

You might think beyond the box as a result of this. Is the missing zero the cause of the error? Or should the number sixteen be a part of the puzzle? Perhaps there’s a problem with the spacing? It’s flawless when you inspect the spacing. Is it possible that a 1 is misinterpreted for an I? No, they’re all unmistakably 1. Is the six not quite right? No, it’s also flawless. Where is the mistake, then?

You may eventually notice that they’re asking you to locate the “mitsake” rather than the error and turn your attention from the numbers to the instructions. That’s correct: the term

The mom who stabbed her baby to death is found dead in prison

Six years into her 17-year-long sentence for stabbing her baby with a pair of scissors, Rachel Tunstill dies in prison.

Back in 2017, she stabbed her baby girl, Mia Kelly, more than 15 times in the bathroom of their Burnley home and threw her lifeless body in a bin.

Tunstill was initially convicted of murder and handed a life sentence with minimum term of 20 years, but a re-trial proved the jury in the case should have been offered a verdict of infanticide to consider. During the re-trial she was once again convicted of murder and put behind bars for a minimum of 17 years.

“HMP Styal prisoner Rachel Tunstill died in custody on 1 August 2023. As with all deaths in custody, the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman will investigate,” a spokesperson from the Prison Service confirmed the news of her passing.

At the time she gave birth, her boyfriend was playing video games in the next room. She then told him she had a miscarriage and asked for the scissors after which she remorselessly stabbed the baby to death.

At the time of sentencing, the judge, Mr Justice King, said: “This must have been a sustained and frenzied attack on a victim who because of her age was particularly vulnerable. Her duty to her newborn baby was to cradle and comfort her – not to stab her to death.

“There was here in my judgement concealment of the body, albeit short-lived and in addition there was undoubtedly the indignity which was wrought upon the body by disposing of it in the way she did.”