As parents, we tend to teach our children to know right from wrong, but oftentimes, because of different reasons, we fail. One father learned that his daughter was bullying a girl who had cancer at school. Things went far and she even pulled the girl’s wig off. This made the father angry so he decided to take matters in his own hands and punished his daughter in a way that caused a stir, as well as mixed emotions, on the Internet. Since many slammed him for how he dealt with his bully daughter, the father later deleted the post.
“My ex-wife and I have a 16-year-old daughter together of which I have full custody (she has moved on with her new family)… My daughter recently got in trouble at school for making fun of a student that lost her hair from cancer treatment. Including pulling off her wig,” he started his post.
“Apparently there is some pre-existing bad blood between the two of them, but I don’t think that even begins to excuse her behavior.”
As it turned out, his daughter was now dating this other girl’s ex-boyfriend and that was the reason why they weren’t fond of each other.
“At some point the other girl mentioned how my daughter’s boyfriend was just using her for sex (this was actually a big shock to me as I had no idea she was sexually active) and called my daughter a sl*t,” the father shared with CafeMom. “That’s what escalated the situation and resulted in the wig incident. Supposedly they have been arguing in class ever since my daughter started dating the guy in question. Basically just stupid teenage ‘he said she said’ nonsense.”After he learned of what was going on and what his daughter did, he gave her two options to choose from in order to teach her a lesson. The first one was for him to throw all her electronics away, and the second one was for her to go to the hairdresser and get a bald haircut. The daughter chose the latter and went to school with a bald head.
“…Everyone thinks I went way overboard. Her mother went ballistic at me saying it will make her the target of bullying (kind of the point, teach her some compassion),” the father wrote.
He believed he did just the right thing, but not many agreed with him. A lot of people took their time to comment on the situation. One person wrote: “Your daughter is a bully because you are a bully. I seriously doubt this is the first time you used abuse and humiliation to ‘teach her a lesson.’” Another person added: “There’s a term for what you did. It’s called child abuse. Taking away her electronics would have been an appropriate punishment. Grounding her would have been an appropriate punishment. Disrespecting her right to bodily autonomy and humiliating her is not an appropriate punishment. She’s unlikely to learn from it and if anything it risks perpetuating a cycle of bullying.”
However, there were also those who praised his parenting. “I support your decision completely. You’re her parent so you have every right to do this, it’s not abusive, it’s real life. If she’s comfortable attacking someone for something they have no choice over she needs to see how it feels,” someone in support of the father wrote.
“She will see what kind of impact actions like hers have on the victim and that will teach her a very important lesson,” another supporter added.
So, what do you think? Do you believe the father went too far with the punishment? Share your thoughts with us in the comment section below.
Cover image: Representational (Source: Getty Images | Photo by Claudia Evans / EyeEm)
Campbell’s Soup: A Tale of Survival Amidst a Changing Market Landscape
The well-known American company Campbell’s Soup, which has endured for almost 200 years, is dealing with serious issues that might force it to close.
The corporation is battling a changing customer trend that deviates from Campbell’s traditionally processed offerings and supports natural and unprocessed food options. Campbell’s bought a number of businesses in an effort to meet the evolving needs of its customers, but regrettably, this action left the company deeply in debt—nearly $9 billion.
In addition to contending with growing debt and shifting market conditions, Campbell’s is also facing internal conflict among its key stockholders. There is a power struggle between the Dorrance family, who own a substantial 40% of Campbell’s shares, and Daniel Loeb, the hedge fund manager of Third Point, who holds about 7% of the company’s stock. Loeb has been pushing for radical changes within the organization, including as rebranding campaigns that might even modify the iconic red and white Campbell’s Soup cans. The Dorrance family, however, objected to this suggested change, which is why Loeb sued the business for purported mismanagement.
There has been movement in the direction of resolution and transformation notwithstanding this tension. Although Campbell’s has criticized Loeb’s claims, both parties have decided to add two of Third Point’s recommended directors to the company’s board. This suggests that additional changes may be in store as Campbell’s works to preserve its existence.
The loyal customer base of Campbell’s Soup stands to lose a great deal from the possible shutdown of the company, which also represents broader trends in consumer choice shifting. While industry watchers regard the shutdown as another example of consumers turning away from processed goods, devoted Campbell’s fans would view it as a significant loss. The organization will need to embrace adaptation and make significant changes to its business model in order to weather this storm and remain relevant in a market that is changing quickly.
In addition to determining Campbell’s own destiny, its actions during this volatile time will offer important insights into how well-known businesses can adjust to shifting customer trends and tastes. Campbell’s story will be used as a case study by companies trying to find a way to embrace change while holding onto tradition.
Leave a Reply