A Florida man was arrested for displaying an obscene bumper sticker on the back of his truck, one that either expressed his sexual preferences, or his love for a four-legged animal.
After Dillon Shane Webb was told the sticker was “derogatory,” he claimed his freedom of expression was violated, and the deputy’s office asked if he was using his free speech to express his desire of “eating a donkey.”
Keep reading to learn why Webb was arrested over a bumper sticker!
In 2019, a Columbia County sheriff’s deputy was driving behind a pickup truck when he noticed a vulgar sticker plastered on the middle of the rear window.
Dashcam footage shows Deputy Travis English stopping his cruiser in a parking lot behind the brown pickup, operated by Dillon Shane Webb, 23, with the bumper sticker in clear view.
The letters on the sticker – printed in bold white – reads, “I EAT A**.”
In the video, the deputy approaches the passenger side of the truck and after saying, “hello gentleman,” he explains that he pulled the car over due to “the derogatory sticker” displayed on the back of his truck.
In Florida, law prohibits “any sticker, decal emblem or other device attached to a motor vehicle containing obscene descriptions, photographs or depictions.”
“How’s it derogatory?” Webb asks from inside the car.
The officer replies, “How’s it not derogatory?”
“Some 10-year-old kid sitting in the passenger seat of his momma’s vehicle looks over and sees ‘I eat a**’ and asks his mom what it means,” English says. “How is she going to explain that?”
Sniping back, the driver provides the wrong answer: “That’s the parent’s job, not my job,” Webb says before he’s asked to present his driver’s license and registration.
After stepping out of the vehicle, Webb is searched, and the deputy tells him the sticker is a “misdemeanor violation of Florida’s obscene materials law.”
“I have four kids…if my 6-year-old was to look at me and like, ‘dad what does I eat a** mean?…he’s curious…and the way [you] handled this situation, I’m not pleased with,” English said before offering Webb the opportunity to explain his sticker to the court system.
Next, the deputy suggests Webb remove one of the letters from the word “A**” to read “AS.” But Webb refused, citing his constitutional right to free speech.
A few minutes later, things take a nasty turn for Webb.
After confirming with his supervisor that he had reasonable rights within the law, English steps out of his cruiser and approaches Webb, who’s leaning against his car, looking at his cellphone.
“All right Mr. Webb. Place your hands behind your back,” Webb is told. When he asks “why?” he learns “because you’re going to jail.”
Asking “for what?” English explains that he was given “the option to take that off” the window, but he “refused.”
He was then arrested and charged with the additional offense of “resisting an officer without violence.”
‘Perverted mind’
“They’re just words,” Webb later told First Coast News. “If that’s how they feel, if they have a perverted mind, that’s on them.”
But according to Sergeant Murray Smith of the Columbia County Sheriff’s Office, it wasn’t just the words on the sticker that Deputy English determined was illegal.
“It was the obscene phrase depicting what the deputy thought was a sexual act, which is obscene by definition,” said Smith. “What would a reasonable citizen think? Is the guy eating a donkey or is he doing a sexual act?”
The incident captured the attention of a lot of social media users, the majority who defended Webb.
“So what if he eats donkey. What’s the big deal?” asks one netizen. Another, referring to English speaking of his child’s potential reaction to the sticker, says, “Since when are a cop’s feelings deserving of an arrest?”
“I live here and as soon as we heard he got arrested we all went and got the sticker and put it on [our] trucks,” pens a third.
Another adds, “He better keep his kids off the internet. They will see far worse than this.”
The State Attorney’s Office cited the First Amendment and the charges against Webb were dropped. Later, Webb sued for alleged violations of his First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights, but U.S. District Judge Marcia Morales Howard of the Middle District of Florida ruled that the arrest was “arguably justified under Florida’s obscenity law,” giving the officer and his supervisor “qualified immunity,” which means they are protected from the lawsuit.
This case underscores the ongoing debate in the U.S. over free speech and its boundaries, especially around expressions some might find offensive or derogatory. It also reflects how the First Amendment remains a contentious issue, with some insisting their right to free expression is under threat, while others argue for consideration that certain messages will have on the population.
What are your thoughts on this story? Please share your thoughts with us and then share it with your friends so we can get the conversation going!
Man and Woman on a Blind Date Surprised to Find Their Kids are Mirror Images of Each Other
Emily rushed into the Italian restaurant, her rainbow-colored clown wig bouncing with each step. She spotted Damon in a corner, wearing a paper hat, and their eyes locked as she approached. “Emily!” Damon greeted her, rising from his chair.
Their banter was lively, with jokes about Emily’s wig and a shared sense of ease. As they delved into conversation, Emily couldn’t help but notice Damon’s son in a photo on his phone. The resemblance to her own son, Bradley, was uncanny, sparking confusion and intrigue.
The discovery led them on a quest for answers, with Damon deciding to confront his ex-wife while Emily stumbled upon a letter hinting at a life-altering secret hidden by her late husband, Jack.
Emily’s mind raced as she recalled the day Jack had brought home Bradley, swaddled in a dinosaur blanket, a moment tinged with both joy and uncertainty. Now, facing the possibility of a hidden truth about Bradley’s origins, Emily delved into Jack’s past, hoping for clarity.
Meanwhile, Damon revisited the facility where his ex-wife resided, seeking answers about the night of their son’s birth, shrouded in mystery and confusion due to Naomi’s battle with mental illness.
As Emily uncovered Jack’s letter, revealing a web of lies and a newborn rescued from an alley, Damon grappled with Naomi’s fragmented memories and the possibility of a long-lost twin.
Their paths converged as they shared their discoveries, grappling with the implications of a shared past that could redefine their futures. Amidst the turmoil, Bradley’s presence loomed large, his confusion and pain mirroring their own.
In a moment of vulnerability and acceptance, they vowed to face the truth together, united by a newfound sense of family and a determination to navigate the unknown with courage and compassion.
As they prepared for the journey ahead, uncertainty lingered, but so did hope, a beacon guiding them through the darkness towards a future forged by honesty, resilience, and the bonds of love.
Leave a Reply