Even though Sir Mick Jagger is one of the most well-known rock stars in the world and has amassed enormous money, he has recently seemed to imply that he will not be transferring his enormous wealth to his offspring.
Since the Rolling Stones’ 1962 London formation, the 80-year-old leader has been a part of the music industry.
The group has since put out 122 singles, 31 studio albums, and 77 music videos. After all of this, the group has sold more than 200 million records worldwide and has been named by Billboard as the second-greatest musician of all time (after The Beatles).
They’ve been together for an incredible 61 years, making them one of the longest-running musical ensembles ever!
Thus, it should come as no surprise that the band members have made a lot of money. Jagger too.
https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?gdpr=0&client=ca-pub-3764810839868565&output=html&h=183&slotname=8851483697&adk=1903871839&adf=697431615&pi=t.ma~as.8851483697&w=730&abgtt=6&fwrn=4&lmt=1725612854&rafmt=11&format=730×183&url=https%3A%2F%2Favokaddo.com%2F2024%2F07%2F30%2Fthe-reason-why-mick-jaggers-children-wont-get-a-cent-of-his-multimillion-dollar-fortune%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwY2xjawFHmlFleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHSKne0LIDVDgFE2-uJDQtASsLmwKm_mb13kzVsyim448QTJw_30QixHEZQ_aem_GDrKF0Xw9PHg0YphUow7Zg&wgl=1&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTUuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTEyLjAuNTE5Ny4xMTUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siTm90L0EpQnJhbmQiLCI4LjAuMC4wIl0sWyJDaHJvbWl1bSIsIjEyNi4wLjY0NzguMjI2Il0sWyJPcGVyYSBHWCIsIjExMi4wLjUxOTcuMTE1Il1dLDBd&dt=1725610755188&bpp=2&bdt=1466&idt=240&shv=r20240904&mjsv=m202409030101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Dcf59a1ce51a438cf%3AT%3D1723566560%3ART%3D1725612756%3AS%3DALNI_MYJaJOB3bsPSunIOMN7MD4c8CDm-Q&eo_id_str=ID%3D0cc428cd87fc972c%3AT%3D1723566560%3ART%3D1725612756%3AS%3DAA-AfjYewfrC42NEkEIcSuBseT-j&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1100x280%2C1645x844%2C730x183&nras=2&correlator=3473351166744&frm=20&pv=1&rplot=4&u_tz=420&u_his=1&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=864&u_aw=1536&u_cd=24&u_sd=1.125&dmc=8&adx=273&ady=2423&biw=1645&bih=844&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=44759875%2C44759926%2C44759842%2C31086638%2C44795921%2C95338229%2C95341664%2C95335245%2C31086139%2C95340845&oid=2&pvsid=2770613619772024&tmod=1794199693&uas=0&nvt=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fl.facebook.com%2F&fc=1920&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1661%2C844&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7CopeEbr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=128&bc=31&bz=0&psd=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDNd&nt=1&ifi=4&uci=a!4&btvi=2&fsb=1&dtd=M
But as he recently stated in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, that doesn’t imply his kids will automatically become wealthy.
https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?gdpr=0&client=ca-pub-3764810839868565&output=html&h=183&slotname=3197500636&adk=2551685252&adf=1889491991&pi=t.ma~as.3197500636&w=730&abgtt=6&fwrn=4&lmt=1725612854&rafmt=11&format=730×183&url=https%3A%2F%2Favokaddo.com%2F2024%2F07%2F30%2Fthe-reason-why-mick-jaggers-children-wont-get-a-cent-of-his-multimillion-dollar-fortune%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwY2xjawFHmlFleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHSKne0LIDVDgFE2-uJDQtASsLmwKm_mb13kzVsyim448QTJw_30QixHEZQ_aem_GDrKF0Xw9PHg0YphUow7Zg&wgl=1&uach=WyJXaW5kb3dzIiwiMTUuMC4wIiwieDg2IiwiIiwiMTEyLjAuNTE5Ny4xMTUiLG51bGwsMCxudWxsLCI2NCIsW1siTm90L0EpQnJhbmQiLCI4LjAuMC4wIl0sWyJDaHJvbWl1bSIsIjEyNi4wLjY0NzguMjI2Il0sWyJPcGVyYSBHWCIsIjExMi4wLjUxOTcuMTE1Il1dLDBd&dt=1725610755190&bpp=1&bdt=1468&idt=275&shv=r20240904&mjsv=m202409030101&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Dcf59a1ce51a438cf%3AT%3D1723566560%3ART%3D1725612756%3AS%3DALNI_MYJaJOB3bsPSunIOMN7MD4c8CDm-Q&eo_id_str=ID%3D0cc428cd87fc972c%3AT%3D1723566560%3ART%3D1725612756%3AS%3DAA-AfjYewfrC42NEkEIcSuBseT-j&prev_fmts=0x0%2C1100x280%2C1645x844%2C730x183%2C730x183&nras=2&correlator=3473351166744&frm=20&pv=1&rplot=4&u_tz=420&u_his=1&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=864&u_aw=1536&u_cd=24&u_sd=1.125&dmc=8&adx=273&ady=2711&biw=1645&bih=844&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=44759875%2C44759926%2C44759842%2C31086638%2C44795921%2C95338229%2C95341664%2C95335245%2C31086139%2C95340845&oid=2&pvsid=2770613619772024&tmod=1794199693&uas=0&nvt=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fl.facebook.com%2F&fc=1920&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1661%2C844&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7CopeEbr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=128&bc=31&bz=0&psd=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDNd&nt=1&ifi=5&uci=a!5&btvi=3&fsb=1&dtd=M
The father-of-eight informed the publication that, contrary to recent trends among well-known musicians, he currently has no plans to sell the band’s post-1971 catalog. This procedure essentially involves a musician selling the copyright to song recordings, or both, depending on the terms of the agreement.
Performers that have sold the rights to their music, such as Bob Dylan and Katy Perry, have made multimillion dollar deals. Bob Dylan made a whopping $300 million by selling Universal Music his whole discography, and it has been alleged that Dolly Parton wants to follow suit.
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Jagger stated that he would not be giving his children any money from The Rolling Stones’ music catalog sale. “The kids can live comfortably without $500 million. Come on, he urged.
However, if a deal is struck, Jagger would rather see the funds donated to a worthy cause. You might make a difference in the world, he said.
The singer of “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” is married to five different women and has eight children total, ages six to fifty-two. Born in 1970 to Jagger and his then-partner Marsha Hunt, the oldest is 52-year-old Karis.
During Jagger’s relationship with Bianca Jagger, to whom he was married from 1971 until 1978, another daughter, 51-year-old Jade, was born.
Actress Jerry Hall, who dated Jagger from 1977 to 1999, was the girlfriend of the musician. Together, the two had four children: Elizabeth, 39, and Georgia May, 31, as well as James, 38, and Gabriel, 25.
Lucas, 24, is Jagger’s eighth child and was born during his relationship with model Luciana Gimenez Morad. Then, in 2016, Jagger’s current partner Melanie Hamrick, a former ballerina and choreographer, gave birth to Deveraux, his youngest child, who is six years old.
Oh my god. That’s a sizable family, so there are plenty of individuals to divide an enormous fortune among!
Recall this legendary item that provided us with a lot of data.
A Glimpse into the Past
Before the digital age, the vintage telephone address/phone book index flip open was a staple in homes and offices. This compact and ingenious device held a treasure trove of contact information, organized in a way that made accessing phone numbers and addresses quick and easy.
Origins and Evolution
The telephone address/phone book index flip open originated in the early 20th century, during a time when telephones were becoming more widespread. People needed a practical way to store and retrieve contact details. The flip-open design, often featuring a spring-loaded mechanism, allowed users to quickly flip to the desired letter and find the needed contact.
Design and Features
These vintage devices were typically made from durable materials like metal or hard plastic. They featured tabs for each letter of the alphabet, making it easy to categorize and locate entries. Some versions even had a small notepad or a slot for storing a pen, adding to their functionality. The tactile experience of flipping through the index and the satisfying click of the mechanism were part of their charm.
Usage and Popularity
In an era without smartphones or digital contacts, these flip-open indexes were indispensable. Families kept them near the telephone for easy access, while businesses relied on them to manage client and supplier information. They were particularly popular in the mid-20th century, coinciding with the post-war economic boom and the subsequent rise in consumer goods.
Legacy and Collectibility
Today, vintage telephone address/phone book indexes are cherished by collectors and nostalgia enthusiasts. They represent a bygone era of simplicity and ingenuity. While they may no longer serve a practical purpose in our digitally connected world, their legacy lives on as a reminder of how people once managed their personal and professional networks.
Modern Influence
The design principles of these vintage devices continue to influence modern technology. The emphasis on organization, ease of use, and quick access can be seen in today’s digital contact management systems. Furthermore, their aesthetic appeal has inspired retro-themed decor and office supplies, blending vintage charm with contemporary functionality.
The vintage telephone address/phone book index flip open remains a beloved relic of the past. Its history, design, and lasting impact on both practical use and cultural nostalgia highlight the ingenuity of simpler times. As a collectible item, it continues to evoke fond memories and admiration for an era when managing contacts was a tactile, deliberate process.
Leave a Reply