Michael Jackson was a picky dresser, and he wanted to stand out. That’s why his costumes had a lot of details that made everyone wonder why they were there and what they meant. For example, almost every jacket Michael Jackson wore had an armband on the right sleeve, and some of his jackets also had “777” sewn onto them.
We at Bright Side are fascinated with Michael Jackson`s wardrobe, and we`re ready to reveal some of the secrets behind his costumes!
1. Why he wore smaller costumes at the end of his shows
Michael Jackson`s dance routines were very physically strenuous, and he gave his all during his performances. By the end of the show, he would often lose up to 5 lbs, and his waist would become one inch thinner. And since it was important that his clothes fit perfectly, so that he could show off his dance moves, every next costume was a bit smaller than the previous one.
2. How his lean shoes worked
Michael Jackson`s shoes that helped him defy the laws of gravity had a V-shaped clasp at the bottom of the heels. With its help, he could hook into a nail attached to the floor and perform his famous 45-degree forward tilt. However, to be able to do that and to keep his whole body straight, an incredible amount of core and leg strength was also needed.
3. Why he only wore one glove
Michael had vitiligo, a skin condition where patches of your skin lose pigment. It started on his hand and he wanted to cover it up. And he thought it would look too ordinary to wear 2 gloves, so he would only wear one.
4. Why almost every jacket had an armband on the right sleeve
Michel Jackson just wanted his clothes to be different from everyone else’s. And having an armband on a sleeve makes your look distinguishable. Michael also liked to make his fans wonder why that armband was there.
5. Why there are 3 № 7s sewn onto his jackets
Michael was the 7th child in his family. Also, he was born in 1958, and if you add 19 plus 58, it equals 77.
6. Why he never polished his shoes
Once, the singer`s managers were concerned about the condition of his shoes and asked his costume designer to polish them. He did it, but it made Michael extremely angry. He explained that the leather was worn off exactly as he needed it to be, and that polishing would make it too slippery for him to perform his dance moves.
7. Why he wore white socks
Michael loved wearing white socks for several reasons. No one else wore white socks with black shoes. Moreover, they would catch the light and attract attention to the movements of his feet when he was dancing.
8. Why he taped his fingers
Hand movements were an important part of Michael Jackson`s dance routines. So he and his costume designers decided to wrap white tape around his fingers in order to attract more light. Michael also decided it would be more unusual to only tape his index, ring, and pinkie fingers. It was also fun for him, because fans would ask why only 3 of his fingers were taped.
When Michael danced, he would unconsciously put his 2 untaped fingers together. And that would also add mysteriousness to his performances, since the fans would think this sign had a secret meaning.
9. What the letters CTE on his jackets stand for
These letters don`t stand for anything. In the 90s, Michael`s costume designers created a few new shirts for him. He liked them, but he wanted to add some letters on the epaulets. He said it didn`t matter which ones, so his costume designers put all of the letters of the alphabet into a hat, and took 3 of them out at random. That`s where the letters “CTE” came from.
Do you think Michael Jackson had great taste in clothes? Is there any costume of his that you like in particular? We`d love to hear your thoughts in the comments!
Preview photo credit Smooth Criminal / Quincy Jones Productions
‘We Left. As Did LOTS of the Crowd’: Fans Shame Miranda Lambert for Her Behavior at Montana Festival – What Happened?
Country music star Miranda Lambert is no stranger to the spotlight, but her recent performance at the Montana Festival has sparked considerable controversy and disappointment among fans. As videos circulated on social media, many expressed their disillusionment, with some claiming they’ve lost interest in the artist altogether. This incident is not the first time Lambert has faced backlash for her behavior on stage, and it raises questions about the balance between performer and audience.
On July 14, during her set at the Montana Festival, Lambert addressed the crowd in a way that many found off-putting. In a clip shared widely online, she can be seen reprimanding the audience for their apparent lack of attention. “I can see your head is not turned the right way, which is this way,” she declared, pointing to herself as if to remind them where the focus should be.
The crowd’s reaction was mixed; while some fans cheered in support of their favorite artist, others felt uncomfortable and even embarrassed. Many attendees, who had come to enjoy the music, began to leave the venue, disheartened by Lambert’s apparent frustration. The atmosphere shifted dramatically from one of excitement to tension, leaving many wondering if this was the Miranda they had once adored.
Social media erupted in response to the incident. Posts flooded platforms, with many fans expressing their disappointment in Lambert’s behavior. Comments ranged from supportive to critical, with some users stating they felt “disrespected” by her attitude. “I used to love her music, but now I’m questioning if I want to support an artist who treats her fans like this,” one commenter wrote.
This backlash has sparked a broader conversation about celebrity behavior and audience expectations. Fans have increasingly voiced their desire for artists to create an inclusive and positive experience, rather than alienating those who have come to enjoy their performances.
This incident is not an isolated occurrence for Lambert. In the past, she has faced scrutiny for her on-stage demeanor, including instances where her comments and actions have rubbed fans the wrong way. Critics argue that such behavior reflects a growing trend among some artists who may take their success for granted and forget the importance of their audience.
For many fans, music is a sanctuary, a place where they can escape their daily lives and connect with others. When an artist behaves in a way that seems dismissive or condescending, it can shatter that illusion and leave listeners feeling alienated. Lambert’s recent actions have raised concerns that she may not fully appreciate the relationship between artist and fan, which is built on mutual respect and admiration.
As the backlash continues to grow, the question remains: what does this mean for Miranda Lambert’s career moving forward? Many fans are vocal about their discontent, but Lambert has a long-standing career filled with chart-topping hits and a loyal following. However, with the rise of social media, artists are more exposed than ever, and a single misstep can lead to a significant shift in public perception.
It will be interesting to see how Lambert addresses this situation, if at all. Will she acknowledge the backlash and make an effort to mend her relationship with fans, or will she brush it off as just another fleeting controversy? In the fast-paced world of country music, the response to such incidents can often dictate an artist’s trajectory.
This incident serves as a reminder of the complexities of celebrity culture. Fans invest emotionally in artists, and when those artists act in a way that feels dismissive, it can lead to a deep sense of betrayal. As the lines between performer and audience continue to blur, it is crucial for artists to recognize their role in shaping the experience of their fans.
Miranda Lambert’s recent actions at the Montana Festival have left many questioning not only her behavior but also the values that underpin the relationship between artists and their supporters. As the dust settles, it remains to be seen whether Lambert will take this opportunity for reflection and growth or whether the controversy will simply fade away, leaving her with a tarnished reputation in the eyes of some fans.
The fallout from the Montana Festival is just one chapter in the ongoing story of Miranda Lambert’s career. While she has captivated audiences with her powerful voice and heartfelt lyrics, her recent behavior raises important questions about accountability and connection in the music industry. As fans await her next move, one thing is clear: the relationship between artists and their audience is a delicate balance, one that requires mutual respect and
Leave a Reply